Whether Sophisticated, Snooty, or Just Strange, I Love Bal a Versailles
It’s often said that “they don’t make ‘em like they used to.” In the case of fragrances, it is very true in two important regards.
The first is that fragrances come in and out of style like clothing — the fragrances of past periods are meant to have a different “feel” than new additions to the market. The second is that formulations change due to cost-cutting or because certain ingredients have become illegal. The long and short of it is that vintage fragrances are intrinsically and so very enjoyably different from today’s fragrances.
I have had the pleasure of wearing Bal a Versailles by Jean Desprez today. It’s not really that old in terms of fragrance history, considering it was originally designed and released in the 1960s. However, it was designed to evoke a period of extravagance, luxuriousness, and decadence. It was meant to be something fitting a ball at the palace of Versailles.
I like it because I find it relaxing and comforting, yes, but also because it is different. It is different because it is vintage and oh-so-not-today’s-fashion. It is musky, powdery, and rich. It is brown in color and brown in feel. It is not a thin, one-note aquatic. In vintage formulation, it is complex, long-lasting, deep, warm, and yes, luxurious.
I have heard that the 1990s reformulation is a pale shadow of the original. I have not tried it out myself, but I can certainly believe it — the reformulated version is a discount fragrance and is geared towards the current fragrance fashion. It certainly will not have the rich essential oils and musk that the original, full-bodied formulation uses so masterfully.
The adjectives that fragrance aficionados use to describe it, and the ones that first intrigued me were “animalic” and “dirty.” Those are not words that marketers will use for today’s fragrances, are they? And that’s perfectly fine by me. In fact, I prefer it that way.
I have made special effort to find vintage bottles of Bal a Versailles in its various concentrations: parfum, eau de parfum (EDP), eau de toilette (EDT) and eau de cologne (EDC). I like all of them, yet it is the EDC that I keep coming back to. Sometimes I use it on its own, sometimes I use it in conjunction with the parfum, but I always enjoy it and am pleasantly impressed by its richness, warmth, and longevity.
I had originally wanted to find something downright dirty and animalic, like I was wearing the pelt of a tiger after having run around the block a few times in the middle of summer. Really. But that isn’t what Bal is like. Yes, a fair number of fragrance fanatics will disagree with me — Bal is still consistently brought up in online discussions about “dirty” fragrances. Bal to me is something refined, but not genteel. It is something elegant, but not dainty. It is something dated, yet timeless.
I should also mention something else about Bal a Versailles. It is a fragrance marketed for women, but I am surely not a woman and do not pretend to be, do not intend to be, and do not want to be. Fragrances are not intrinsically feminine or masculine — and I will write a post about that later — and Bal certainly does not fall neatly into one side or the other. It is eminently wearable by men.
I like to be different. I like to express my uniqueness by having and using unique things. I like things to be high-quality. The vintage formulation of Bal a Versailles, in all its strengths, meets my needs and I thoroughly enjoy it. The fact that it is not well known, and the fact that it is so unabashedly anti-contemporary, works just fine for me. It means that what I enjoy remains unique almost anywhere I go, and it means those vintage bottles on the market stay far cheaper than the vintage Guerlains that I also love!
I doubt anyone would seriously describe me as sophisticated. I never intended to be snooty. I could not care less if anyone thinks me strange. I just use what I enjoy, and I think one of the great little pleasures in life is Bal a Versailles.