Get Multiple Viewpoints from Multiple Cookbooks
It has always been obvious to me, but every once in a while I get the question, “Why have so many Japanese/Italian/French/Chinese/Indian/Caribbean/whatever cookbooks? You just need one of each type, right?” Maybe you would ask me the same thing. My answer is simple. You get better advice and better food when you can consult different cookbooks.
- No one cookbook is totally comprehensive.
- Each author has their own take on things, and their own strengths.
No one cookbook will cover everything. It can’t, because it’s made for a different audience, and has a different purpose and intent. One cookbook might focus more on casual, family cooking. Another might be fancier and focus on restaurant-grade cooking. Yet another may focus on traditional dishes and recipes, and a final one might be take a fusion perspective on the cuisine.
Each author has their own perspectives on food in general and on the cuisine in particular. Food is an expression of the person who prepares it. Each chef who writes a cookbook brings his or her own biases, preferences, and style to the book and its recipes. That, really, is why you buy cookbooks from one author and not another!
By having multiple cookbooks that, at first glance, seem to all cover the same ground, you get advice and guidance from different advisors. Having a cookbook and referring to a cookbook is like having the chef or author in your kitchen giving you guidance. Like every other field in life, the decisions you make for yourself are likely to be better when you can hear different experts give you their advice.
Take dashi, for instance. That’s the basic stock fundamental to so much of Japanese cooking. It’s simple as hell with 3 ingredients: water, kombu (sea kelp) and bonito. That’s it. Yet when I consult different cookbooks by different authors, there are slight differences in how they approach it.
- A book focused on soup noodles emphasizes the convenience factor. Close enough is good enough. Soak the kombu in room temperature water for 20 minutes and bring it to a boil, then remove. Keep at a simmer, add bonito for 10 minutes and remove.
- A book focused on art, presentation, and restaurant-grade preparation, emphasizes quality. You get the best damn kombu you can, and let it soak overnight in room-temperature water, and you take the kombu out before you boil the stock. Take off heat, put in the bonito, when it sinks to the bottom, remove.
- A book focused on traditional preparation emphasizes soulful, attentive cooking with an eye to economy and getting the most use out of your ingredients. It notes the difference between primary dashi, which takes centre stage (as in soup noodles), and secondary dashi, which is used for making sauces. Soak the kombu, bring *almost* to a boil but don’t let the water reach a boil, and remove, saving it to make secondary dashi. Bring to boil, add bonito, add some cool water to bring it down from boil, when it boils again, remove bonito and save for secondary dashi.
I agree that it costs more money to stock multiple books that cover some of the same ground. Unfortunately, the only way to become excellent at what you do is to get the best instruction you can and then learn for yourself which way to go. For those of us who don’t cook professionally, instruction from authors and chefs we trust is the best way to build that foundation of knowledge upon which real skill is built.
Even for something so simple as dashi soup stock, there are differences in the details. Even with only 3 ingredients, you can see there are differences in the approach each chef takes and advises.
Add up enough details and you end up with noticeably different results in your food. This applies to every kind of cuisine you want to prepare.
If you want to be excellent, or even just very good, I would suggest that you need to have, ready at hand, multiple viewpoints from multiple authors and cookbooks.